Lcd tv no good for sports or action shows? - action sports tv
how is it really a big problem. Nobody is a clear answer, fired out of fear, there I guess. I saw a football game once and I saw a significant delay in the execution of the screen. Improving the equipment is the same film. and no, I'm not buying the 120 HZ. provides compensation for the greedy companies to run their products on the market before the failure are removed.at a price of $ 800 to $ 1800, I am sure no one will not consent, but firmly shills.i my CRT would replace 15 years. Help!
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Action Sports Tv Lcd Tv No Good For Sports Or Action Shows?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Early action, it is certainly a problem with motion blur.
If it is important to you, then you definitely should consider plasma considered. I made a list of pros and cons of each technology. Maybe will help you.
LCD:
Lighter
Growing - Perfect for bright rooms or rooms with natural light
Energy Efficient
Poor viewing angle - the deterioration of the image to move laterally, as the television off.
More expensive in larger sizes
It shows the darkest and
The motion blur could be a problem, but not as strong as previous generations
No burn in problems
More easily damaged screen
Plasma:
Heavier
It is not so bright - not suitable for bright rooms or rooms with natural light.
Less energy efficient and runs hot
Wide Viewing Angle
Less expensive in larger sizes
Example of the dark scenes better
No motion blur
Subject to burn in, but not as much as previous generations
The screen is the most sustainable
Many do not know, but LCD screegen are more susceptible to damage. My son has started a pacifier for our new 52 "LCD to life, spilling a small group of pixels. Poke screens in the store with his finger." Ll see what I mean.
Early action, it is certainly a problem with motion blur.
If it is important to you, then you definitely should consider plasma considered. I made a list of pros and cons of each technology. Maybe will help you.
LCD:
Lighter
Growing - Perfect for bright rooms or rooms with natural light
Energy Efficient
Poor viewing angle - the deterioration of the image to move laterally, as the television off.
More expensive in larger sizes
It shows the darkest and
The motion blur could be a problem, but not as strong as previous generations
No burn in problems
More easily damaged screen
Plasma:
Heavier
It is not so bright - not suitable for bright rooms or rooms with natural light.
Less energy efficient and runs hot
Wide Viewing Angle
Less expensive in larger sizes
Example of the dark scenes better
No motion blur
Subject to burn in, but not as much as previous generations
The screen is the most sustainable
Many do not know, but LCD screegen are more susceptible to damage. My son has started a pacifier for our new 52 "LCD to life, spilling a small group of pixels. Poke screens in the store with his finger." Ll see what I mean.
Early action, it is certainly a problem with motion blur.
If it is important to you, then you definitely should consider plasma considered. I made a list of pros and cons of each technology. Maybe will help you.
LCD:
Lighter
Growing - Perfect for bright rooms or rooms with natural light
Energy Efficient
Poor viewing angle - the deterioration of the image to move laterally, as the television off.
More expensive in larger sizes
It shows the darkest and
The motion blur could be a problem, but not as strong as previous generations
No burn in problems
More easily damaged screen
Plasma:
Heavier
It is not so bright - not suitable for bright rooms or rooms with natural light.
Less energy efficient and runs hot
Wide Viewing Angle
Less expensive in larger sizes
Example of the dark scenes better
No motion blur
Subject to burn in, but not as much as previous generations
The screen is the most sustainable
Many do not know, but LCD screegen are more susceptible to damage. My son has started a pacifier for our new 52 "LCD to life, spilling a small group of pixels. Poke screens in the store with his finger." Ll see what I mean.
Early action, it is certainly a problem with motion blur.
If it is important to you, then you definitely should consider plasma considered. I made a list of pros and cons of each technology. Maybe will help you.
LCD:
Lighter
Growing - Perfect for bright rooms or rooms with natural light
Energy Efficient
Poor viewing angle - the deterioration of the image to move laterally, as the television off.
More expensive in larger sizes
It shows the darkest and
The motion blur could be a problem, but not as strong as previous generations
No burn in problems
More easily damaged screen
Plasma:
Heavier
It is not so bright - not suitable for bright rooms or rooms with natural light.
Less energy efficient and runs hot
Wide Viewing Angle
Less expensive in larger sizes
Example of the dark scenes better
No motion blur
Subject to burn in, but not as much as previous generations
The screen is the most sustainable
Many do not know, but LCD screegen are more susceptible to damage. My son has started a pacifier for our new 52 "LCD to life, spilling a small group of pixels. Poke screens in the store with his finger." Ll see what I mean.
Post a Comment